Thursday, February 23, 2006

An Australian on free speech and cultural relativism

Here's an Australian, Keith Windschuttle, on cultural relativism. He manages to say a lot of what I've been thinking in a far more pithy way.

I'm starting to think we have a serious battle on our hands and we haven't yet realised what the danger might be.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Free speech

I think the Catholic Church in New Zealand is flat wrong to take offence - but I defend their right to say so.
The Catholic Church are taking offence at satire - well they've been taking offence at, and attempting to silence, anyone who disagrees with them for millenia - and this includes scientists like Gallileo Gallilei.
We went through all this with the Enlightenment - where Western culture decided that free speech was a far more vital plank to happiness than attempting not to offend the local shamans.

But now that freedom is under threat from Muslims, Catholics and the President of the United States.

The Catholic Church's stand runs the risk of being a chilling affect on free speech and encouraging uncertain self-censorship. Editors are not clear on where they should draw the line and are more likely to draw the line too narrow by mistake. But we have a way of agreeing on what the boundaries on free speech are - it's called Parliament where all the people are represented. We have laws such as the Film, Videos and Publications Act 1993, the Defamation Act, and the act that set up the Broadcasting Standards Authority. In enacting these acts Parliament consulted with all the public using the Select Committeee process. The resulting legislation can then be held to be the will of the people.

But the Catholic Church, and the Muslims who protested, wish to impose their own opinion of decency and offence on the rest of us. They should be resisted.

Patrick Quin of Macs Recruitment has decided to remove his advertising from CanWest's radio networks in a boycott. That's his right. Can I suggest that those of us who desire freedom of opinion boycott Macs Recruitment in turn.

The Muslim cartoon incident is a little different - and my opinion has been seesawing on this for a while. There are good points made on both sides. The problem is two-fold. The cartoons in question have little value beyond provocation. They weren't funny. The second problem is that they were published in newspapers where it is hard to avoid them and Muslim shopkeepers have to choose whether to sell it. Because South Park is on TV people can quite simply avoid watching it. It will be shown with warnings in front of it. If the show will offend you, choose not to watch you. But do not impose your sense of offence on the rest of us.

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

[US] Late night TV comics target Cheney

Very funny - highly recommended.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

So you want to see what a real computer security expert does?

Take a look at the cool stuff my good friend Adam does with wireless networks and visual mappeers.

Nice...

Thursday, February 02, 2006

7s parade going past now

Colourful and noisy. Each country represents itself with whatever of note it gave to the world. The Fijians are noisily partying with big warrious out the front, the Canadians have an ice hockey team while the English are merely giving the crowd the royal wave, The Kiwi contingent has Tim Finn singing from the back of a truck. The Americans? What did they give the world? Colonel Sanders and, in a convertible, three Presidents and a blonde.

Seemed cogent somehow.